Islamic Sharia by the Quran/Hadith and the Muslim Woman

by

Rape by Islamist! Abominable atrocities against women enforced by Sharia Law. Time to take out more insurance.

Can we make a jump and state there is a connection to the Quran and Sharia Law one that compliments the other? Yes. Can we also make the jump that Sharia Law bolsters the acts of the men who commit the atrocity? Can we then follow that the Quran is a culprit as well. Yes I think that is a reasonable, correct argument.

Punishment of males who participate in violence against women, whether as a bystander or a direct participant, if punished for their act is lame at best. It is for the most part that the woman who was raped suffers additional punishment, is held accountable of course if she is still alive.

Advertisements

See Something, Say Something

by

This is a DHS campaign that I am sure we all are familiar with. DHS explains it on their website the following way:

“The nationwide “If You See Something, Say Something™” public awareness campaign – is a simple and effective program to raise public awareness of indicators of terrorism and terrorism-related crime, and to emphasize the importance of reporting suspicious activity to the proper local law enforcement authorities. The campaign was originally used by New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), which has licensed the use of the slogan to DHS for anti-terrorism and anti-terrorism crime related efforts.”

Public School System or Government Indoctrination Center (Part 1)

by

Please excuse my French on this, I am sure everyone speaks a bit of French from time to time. I guess the reason this upsets me so much is young children are venerable and defenseless. We as a people, I mean every person must take responsibility to care for a child, protect them. We must also do this as a society, watch over them even if they are not our kids. And most importantly our government must also treat the children of America as our greatest National asset. Not only is the protection of our children a matter of law, it is also a moral responsibility. As a human being it is simply Natural Law that illuminates our moral responsibility as an individual person, a community and as a Nation to nurture and develop young minds into adulthood.

On Gay Marriage

by

Most believe it is government’s role to grant marriage. Only government has the right to say who can marry and who cannot. Is there anyone else who sees a fundamental problem with this theory? Government collects revenue through marriage licensing, a tax if you will, on your right to marry someone, ludicrous. What if the government decides that a straight person is not worthy to marry for whatever reason they choose? For example that person does not earn a set amount of money, a person is an ex-felon, a person does not have the right characteristics, genes for what the government legislates for producing the optimal human being. Where does government intrusion into the privacy, freedoms and liberty stop?

Why Are There Not Mass Protests Regarding Government Overreach in American Consumption of Food, Soda’s?

by

I know that I am not the only one asking the question but I will talk about it anyway. It is my right as an American citizen guaranteed by the Constitution just as it is your right to read or not or to agree or disagree with what I am writing.

The real question is why American citizen’s of NYC are not protesting en masses at NYC city hall with a 32 oz. coke in their hand? I’m bothered by this. According to one Rasmussen poll, only 11% of Americans surveyed had no stance on the ban; 63% opposed it, and 23% were in support. OK so we by-and-large are opposed, 11% are clueless and 23% are fascist. Showing opposition through a poll, while useful, is not the same as en masses protesting.

Why Put Personal Energy in Worrying About the Government’s Assault on Presumption of Privacy, Liberty and Freedom?

by

Valid question. In a recent conversation I had with a friend she posed the following, Government has always spied on its citizens. That is true. Government has spied and infiltrated groups they deemed a possible threat to national security, threat to business interests. McCartythism was perhaps a most egregious outcome of government actions. Many examples of government spying on groups and individuals exist throughout our history. Over time legislation has followed trying to keep pace in ensuring government and business interest and enacting legislation that would stand in court.

Academia: Left vs. Conservative Leaning?

by

As Patriots and a reader of many blogs and articles there is no doubt that the question of academia being controlled by the left can be said new-stressedto be unanimous. This topic on examination will surely elicit more controversy. While assumptions often drive our belief I believe the assumptions are often based on those academics that rise to have a powerful voice in driving public policy in government, policy that is antithetical to liberty, self reliance individual choice of values, lifestyles and then there is the sticky the notion of collectivism held exclusively by the liberal.

Chipping Away at Liberty and Freedoms

by

The 4th Amendment of the Bill of Rights states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” This assault has been ratcheted up since the 9/11 attacks. As we the people we have been complacent, for the most part, whether out of fear, or false flags created by our government. While it must be acknowledged there doe exist threats to America both domestic and foreign we must evaluate the types of threats as they relate to the chipping away of our fundamental freedoms. Benjamin Franklin was quoted as saying “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

Invasion from the South

by

Well the Senate will vote to extend funding the Federal gov’t. The House it is expected to pass as well. The budget debate rails on and on.

Amnesty will be granted. Complete overhaul of immigration will happen although the debate will be lively. But it will go forward.

We have on avg. deported 400,000/year. We keep on avg 34,000/day incarcerated. We spend on avg. $122/per day for their incarceration (some areas the cost is $166/per day). We pay the private corrections folks regardless for beds, contracts drive, even if they have no warm body occupying. We release on avg. 1000 immigrants per/day. We fund those who are cuffed at home. 40% as reported, most likely higher, never show up for a hearing. Bonds people get in on the dollars when some are released. Green cards are provide

The Religion of Peace or The Personification of Evil

by

Muslims are creating a lot of problems for the world today and civilized societies everywhere. They seem to have a specific interest in Western culture based on Christianity and Jewish beliefs. Not really sure how to express my views on who they are, what they are about and the things they are doing today. I do have a lot to say about them because where ever they are, death and destruction eventually follow. If you look at most every violent conflict and wars going on in the world today, Islam seems to be right in the middle of it. You have to ask yourself just why this is? What is it about Muslims and Islam with respect to the rest of the world that leads to such destruction and unspeakable evil?

A New Order of Czars and Super Committees

by

So what’s up with Obama’s fascination with Czars (Tsar)? I mean why bring Russian culture into America? Is there a reason for this he thinks will benefit our political system? What purpose do they serve, who do they work for and answer to, what are they being paid and by who and what power do they yield.

What is a Czar and where does it originate? Czar (also spelled as tsar) literally means an emperor or a male monarch. It was the imperial title of Russian rulers, who ruled Russia from 16th century until the Bolshevik revolution in 1917. The title Czar is derived from the Latin word Caesar, the title of Roman emperors. Czar also means a person having great power. The Russian Czars were the rulers of Russia, whose reign began with Ivan, the Terrible and ended with Nicholas II.

A Cabinet of Radicals Progressive Revolutionaries

by

You just have to wonder about who Obama really is and what he is all about. He has nominated some of the most Progressive Radicals in America today for his Cabinet positions and Congress just seems to be either ignorant as to who these people are or fine with them by confirming them. They say “show me your friends and I’ll tell you who your are”, there is a lot of truth in that!

I have never in my life seen such a group of Leftist people being placed into positions of power by any President. Individuals that have plainly and openly expressed their hostel views on America both privately and publicly. Many of them have direct ties to Communist and Socialist organizations right here in America, some have strong Union ties and others are linked to people such as George Soros.

When the Dollar Fails

by

We as well as others question why the DHS had and is forming a standing army equipped at a similar level of a military assault force. We question why they have acquired 1.6 Billion rounds of tier 1 ammo, 7,000+ fully automatic defensive weapons and 2,700 armored military vehicles while pushing the recruitment of thousands of armed federal officers across too many federal LEO agencies to list, ALL WITHIN THE LAST 12 MONTHS. We question why DHS is effectively eliminating the supply of ammo for the American citizen. Lastly I at least question the tactics and ferocity being displayed at the federal and state level to disarm the general population.